|
▭\:\longdivision{▭} | \times \twostack{▭}{▭} | + \twostack{▭}{▭} | - \twostack{▭}{▭} | \left( | \right) | \times | \square\frac{\square}{\square} |
|
- \twostack{▭}{▭} | \lt | 7 | 8 | 9 | \div | AC |
+ \twostack{▭}{▭} | \gt | 4 | 5 | 6 | \times | \square\frac{\square}{\square} |
\times \twostack{▭}{▭} | \left( | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | x |
▭\:\longdivision{▭} | \right) | . | 0 | = | + | y |
Polar and Cartesian coordinates describe position in different ways. A radar system tracks a plane using polar coordinates. It reports how far the plane is from the tower and at what angle. But once the plane lands, the airport map uses Cartesian coordinates to show its location on the runway. Some systems are built for angles. Others are built for straight lines. In this article, we’ll look at what polar and Cartesian coordinates are, how to convert between them, and how to use Symbolab’s Polar to Cartesian Calculator to check your steps or see them more clearly.
Imagine standing at a point and asking, “Where is that object?”
You can answer in two completely valid ways. You can say how far to walk forward and in which direction. Or you can break it down into how many steps to the right, then how many steps forward. These are two different systems for describing the same location.
In the Cartesian system, every point is described by how far it is from the origin in two directions: across and up. We write it as $(x, y)$.
It’s like placing furniture on a floor using a tape measure. You start from the corner of the room, measure 4 feet along the wall, and then 3 feet into the room. That gives you the point $(4, 3)$.
Or picture plotting a point on graph paper. You count squares over, then count squares up. Simple, straight, and reliable. This system works well when the space around you is structured. Walls, roads, screens, and grids all fit naturally into Cartesian thinking.
In the polar system, you don’t move across and then up. You start at the origin and describe a point by saying how far out it is and in what direction.
The point is written as $(r, \theta)$.
$r$ is the distance from the origin
$\theta$ θ is the angle measured counter-clockwise from the positive horizontal ($x$) axis.
Imagine standing in the middle of a frozen lake. Someone tells you there’s a red flag 10 meters away, 30 degrees to your right. That is a polar description. You are not told to go 5 meters east and 8.7 meters north. That would be Cartesian. Polar lets you walk directly to the spot.
Here’s another way to picture it:
You aim a flashlight at an angle and walk forward 10 steps. Wherever your light is pointing, that’s the direction of $\theta$ However far you walk, that’s $r$ The point you reach is $(r, \theta)$.
These systems describe the same space. Every point in one system has a matching point in the other.
A dot at $(3, 3\sqrt{3})$ in Cartesian can also be written as $(6, \frac{\pi}{3})$ in polar. They land on the same spot. That doesn’t mean one is better than the other. It just means you get to pick the one that fits the shape of your problem. When movement happens in curves, angles, or spins, polar is often more natural. When space is built in straight lines or boxes, Cartesian usually makes more sense.
Once you understand what polar and Cartesian coordinates describe, moving between them is just a matter of unpacking the geometry. You are translating one language into another.
When going from polar to Cartesian, you use two formulas:
$x = r \cos(\theta)$
$y = r \sin(\theta)$
That’s it. These are not shortcuts or tricks. They come straight from the triangle hiding inside the circle.
Imagine this: you draw a line from the origin to a point somewhere out in space. That’s your radius, $r$. It forms an angle $\theta$ with the horizontal axis. Now drop a vertical line from that point to the $x$-axis. You’ve made a right triangle.
In this triangle:
Trigonometry tells you how to break that slanted side into horizontal and vertical parts.
$x = r \cos(\theta)$
$y = r \sin(\theta)$
If you understand that one triangle, you understand the whole idea.
A Note on Angles
This part matters: your calculator needs to know what kind of angle you are using.
If your angle is in degrees, like 30°, 90°, or 135°, then your calculator must be in degree mode. If it is in radian mode, it will treat 30 as 30 radians, which is more than four full turns.
To convert degrees to radians, multiply by $\frac{\pi}{180}$.
For example:
$60^\circ = 60 \times \frac{\pi}{180} = \frac{\pi}{3}$
If your calculator is giving you strange or wildly wrong values, check the angle mode first. That solves most mistakes.
A Quick Look at Real Life
These formulas show up whenever you need to switch between something turning and something placed.
A weather radar might spot a storm 100 kilometers away at a bearing of 120°. That’s a polar description. But if the system needs to overlay that data on a flat satellite map, it has to convert it to $(x, y)$, the storm’s horizontal and vertical offset from the radar center.
Navigation note: a bearing of 120° is measured clockwise from north; to use the formulas above, counter-clockwise from east, subtract 90° or convert the angle before computing.
In robotics, imagine a rotating camera on top of a moving car. It detects an object 5 meters away, at a 45° angle from the car’s current direction. That’s a polar point. To plan a path around it, the system converts it to Cartesian, it needs to know how many meters left and how many meters forward to steer.
Even in animation software, circular motions are often drawn in polar. But when the program renders each frame, it needs to plot actual positions on a 2D screen. That means converting each $(r, \theta)$ into $(x, y)$ in real time.
In each case, the triangle never changes. The formulas work the same way. Only the context changes, storm, robot, camera, or code.
What If the Angle Is Negative?
Negative angles just mean you rotate clockwise instead of counterclockwise. The math still works. The sine and cosine functions take care of the direction for you. Just keep an eye on the quadrant, that’s where signs change. You can also keep the angle positive and let the radius carry the minus sign: $(−r, θ + π)$ lands on the very same point.
What These Formulas Really Do
They take direction and distance, the polar view, and unpack them into sideways and upward steps. That’s the Cartesian view. The formulas don’t just tell you where the point is. They show you how to get there.
Let’s say you’re given a point in polar coordinates:
$\left(2, \frac{\pi}{3} \right)$
This means:
The point is 2 units away from the origin
It’s angled $\frac{\pi}{3}$ radians from the positive $x$-axis.
We want to find its Cartesian coordinates, written as $(x, y)$.
We’ll use the same two formulas:
$x = r \cos(\theta)$
$y = r \sin(\theta)$
Let’s go step by step.
From the point $(2, \frac{\pi}{3})$:
$r = 2$
$\theta = \frac{\pi}{3}$
$x = 2 \cos\left(\frac{\pi}{3}\right)$
$y = 2 \sin\left(\frac{\pi}{3}\right)$
These values are often memorized in trig, but here they are:
$\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{3}\right) = \frac{1}{2}$
$\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{3}\right) = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$
So:
$x = 2 \cdot \frac{1}{2} = 1$
$y = 2 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} = \sqrt{3}$
Final Answer:
$\left(2, \frac{\pi}{3} \right)$ in polar becomes $(1, \sqrt{3})$ in Cartesian.
You didn’t do anything fancy. You took a direction and distance, broke it into parts, and found out how far across and how far up that point really is.
Think of it like using a compass to walk a set distance in a specific direction and then using grid paper to figure out exactly where you ended up.
Once you see it clearly, the process becomes mechanical. You just need to be careful with values, signs, and angles.
Convert the polar point $(5, 210^\circ)$ into Cartesian coordinates.
The angle is in degrees, not radians. So make sure your calculator is in degree mode before continuing. If you’re working by hand and need to use radians, convert like this:
$210^\circ = 210 \times \frac{\pi}{180} = \frac{7\pi}{6}$
We’ll use degrees here, since it’s more common when dealing with real-world inputs.
$r = 5$
$\theta = 210^\circ$
$x = 5 \cos(210^\circ)$
$y = 5 \sin(210^\circ)$
You don’t need to know exact trig values here, just punch it in:
$\cos(210^\circ) \approx -0.866$
$\sin(210^\circ) \approx -0.5$
Now calculate:
$x = 5 \cdot (-0.866) = -4.33$
$y = 5 \cdot (-0.5) = -2.5$
Final Answer:
$(5, 210^\circ)$ becomes approximately $(-4.33, -2.5)$
What’s Happening Here
The radius points 5 units out, and the angle tells you to rotate into the third quadrant where both $x$ and $y$ are negative. That’s why the result sits down and to the left.
You could plot it on paper and see it land below the $x$-axis and left of the $y$-axis. Even if the values don’t come out neat, the logic is the same.
The math itself is straightforward, but small details can easily throw off your answer. Here are five common mistakes to look out for.
Always check your calculator’s angle mode. If your angle is in degrees, the calculator must be in degree mode. Using the wrong setting gives completely wrong results.
Remember the pattern:
Use cosine to find $x$
Use sine to find $y$
Mixing them up leads to the wrong coordinates, even if the numbers look reasonable.
Angle location affects the signs of $x$ and $y$.
Watch the angle and adjust signs accordingly. Here’s a quick cheat sheet: $\text{Q1 }(+x,+y),\ \text{Q2 }(-x,+y),\ \text{Q3 }(-x,-y),\ \text{Q4 }(+x,-y)$
If you round trig values before the final step, your answer might be noticeably off. Wait until the very end to round.
If converting degrees to radians by hand, use 3.1416 for π, not just 3.14. Or better, use the π button on your calculator to avoid rounding errors.
Each of these is easy to fix once you know where to look. Take your time and check your steps.
Symbolab can help you check your work, see each step clearly, and understand how the conversion unfolds. Here’s how to use it.
You can enter your polar coordinates in several ways:
Once the expression is entered, press the Go button to start the solution.
Symbolab shows the formulas used, the substitution, simplification, and final result. Each step is broken down clearly.
If you prefer to go slowly, turn on the option to reveal one step at a time.
Use the Chat with Symbo feature if something is unclear. You can ask follow-up questions about the steps or the rules being applied.
Using a tool like this is not about shortcuts. It’s about checking your reasoning and building confidence. You can use it to verify your own steps or to walk through unfamiliar problems without guessing.
Polar and Cartesian coordinates describe the same point in different ways. One gives distance and angle, the other gives horizontal and vertical steps. Knowing how to move between them helps you solve problems more flexibly and understand space more clearly. When in doubt, return to the triangle. It’s always there.
cartesian-calculator
en
Please add a message.
Message received. Thanks for the feedback.