Example
Here is a very simple example of how difficult voting can be. Consider the election described by the following preference schedule.
|
5 |
5 |
5 |
1st choice |
A |
C |
B |
2nd choice |
B |
A |
C |
3rd choice |
C |
B |
A |
Notice that in this election:
- 10 people prefer A to B
- 10 people prefer B to C
- 10 people prefer C to A
No matter whom we choose as the winner, 2/3 of voters would prefer someone else! This scenario is dubbed
Condorcet’s Voting Paradox, and demonstrates how voting preferences are not transitive (just because A is preferred over B, and B over C, does not mean A is preferred over C). In this election, there is no fair resolution.
It is because of this impossibility of a totally fair method that Plurality, IRV, Borda Count, Pairwise Comparisons, and dozens of variants are all still used. Usually the decision of which method to use is based on what seems most fair for the situation in which it is being applied.